Why is precision cutting different in aerospace and defence?
In aerospace and defence, a part simply being within size is never enough. You also need a record of which material and which melt/cast lot it came from, on which machine and with which parameters it was cut, and what the measurement results were. A single failed component in an aircraft or weapon system can have unacceptable consequences. That is why precision cutting departs from ordinary contract cutting and demands a discipline built around traceability, repeatability and documentation.
When our team works in this field, cutting is treated not as a standalone operation but as one link in a controlled chain that runs from material intake to delivery. We use the same waterjet and fiber laser infrastructure for general contract cutting too; but for aerospace and defence parts we rebuild the entire process around tight tolerance targets and complete records.
What does material traceability actually mean?
Traceability is the ability to trace every part back to the raw material it was made from. In practice, this means linking the plate's melt/heat lot number, its material certificate (for example, an EN 10204 3.1 inspection document) and its grade code to the finished part. That way, it can later be proven which batch a titanium or Inconel component came from, and what its chemical and mechanical properties were.
We build this chain on a per-part basis: incoming material is matched to its certificate and tied to a work order, and after cutting each part is associated with its melt number. As a result, the origin of the batch we deliver never stays ambiguous. On request, material certificates and cutting/inspection records can be filed alongside the part, which significantly eases supplier audits on defence programmes.
How does cold (waterjet) cutting benefit alloys?
Abrasive waterjet cuts cold, using a mix of water and abrasive driven at pressures of up to 6,000 bar. Unlike thermal methods such as laser or plasma, it produces no heat-affected zone (HAZ) at the cut edge. This is critical for aerospace alloys such as aluminium 7075, titanium Ti-6Al-4V, Inconel and high-strength stainless, because the metallurgical structure, hardness and fatigue strength of these materials are all vulnerable to heat damage.
With no HAZ, you eliminate the risk of micro-cracks, a recast (re-melted) layer or heat-induced softening at the cut edge. The part's fatigue life is preserved, and in many cases the need for additional heat treatment or edge dressing is reduced. On thick titanium and superalloy plates, waterjet is one of the few methods that can protect both the geometry and the material integrity at the same time.
How do we hold tight tolerances in practice?
In precision cutting, the achievable tolerance depends on material type, thickness and geometry. Our 5-axis waterjet compensates for the taper that naturally occurs in a waterjet stream, producing straight, square edges, with positional accuracy typically around ± 0.05 mm. For thin sheet and fine contours, fiber laser offers high repeatability and a narrow kerf.
Guaranteeing tolerance is not just a matter of the machine; fixturing, cutting sequence, abrasive flow and feed rate all directly affect the result. For critical parts, we therefore begin with a first-article approval and verify dimensions with calipers and micrometers and, where required, a CMM. At the quotation stage, we clarify with you which tolerance can be held economically by which method.
Which cutting method suits which part?
The general rule is this: waterjet is preferred for heat-sensitive, thick or multi-layer/composite materials, and wherever metallurgical integrity must be preserved. For thin to medium steel/stainless sheet, high-volume runs and sharp contours, fiber laser offers a speed and cost advantage. On most defence projects the two methods complement each other: the main profile can be cut by waterjet and the fine details by laser.
We use the same infrastructure for general contract cutting, so we can manage all the metal components of a project — from cutting to machining — from a single source. On the aerospace and defence side, however, the emphasis shifts away from raw speed and toward capturing the right material integrity and tolerance with the right method.
How does the process work with a DXF file and drawing?
The process usually starts with a DXF (2D) or STEP/STL (3D) file plus a technical drawing that specifies tolerances. A cleanly drawn DXF — with closed contours, the correct 1:1 scale and clearly marked critical dimensions — speeds up production and reduces errors. If you don't have a drawing, we can create one from a sample or from your measurements.
The drawing should state the material grade, thickness, tolerances, expected edge quality and, if needed, any traceability or documentation requirement. This information lets us both produce an accurate quote and set the cutting parameters correctly from the outset. On defence work, having the revision number and part number clear in the file is important to prevent mix-ups later on.
What is our quality and documentation approach?
We run our processes with the discipline aerospace expects — defined workflows, parameter records and inspection reports. On request, we can add documents such as the material certificate, the first-article inspection report, the cutting-parameter log and a Certificate of Conformity (CoC) to the delivery package. This speeds up incoming quality control on the buyer's side.
We want to underline an important distinction here: performing precision cutting with aerospace-level rigour is not the same as claiming to hold a particular quality certificate. Our process discipline and traceability infrastructure are in place; we discuss your concrete certification requirements on a per-project basis and state clearly which documentation we can provide. Our aim is to offer provable records rather than overstated claims.
What determines price and lead time?
The main drivers of price are material grade and cost, thickness, the total contour length to be cut, part quantity, the expected tolerance/edge quality, and the required level of documentation. Unit cost falls at higher volumes, while tight tolerances and full reporting raise the price somewhat due to the added engineering and inspection effort.
The most reliable approach is to share your DXF/STEP file and technical drawing; our team will then prepare a clear quote with a material recommendation, the appropriate method (waterjet / fiber laser) and a realistic lead time. Consolidating prototype and series production with a single supplier reduces both coordination overhead and total cost.
